PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • A simple theory of power relations is developed in an effort to resolve some of the ambiguities surrounding "power," "authority," "legitimacy," and power "structures," through bringing them together in a coherent scheme. After defining a reciprocal power-dependence relation, attention is focused upon properties of balance and "balancing operations" in such relations. The theory dictates exactly four generic types of balancing process, and discussion of these leads directly into processes of group formation, including the emergence of group norms, role structure and status hierarchy, all presented as the outcome of balancing tendencies in power relations. Within the framework of this theory, authority appears quite naturally to be legitimized power, vested in roles, and "legitimation" is seen as a special case of the coalition process through which norms and role-prescriptions are formed. Finally, through treating both persons and groups as actors in a power-network (two or more connected powerdependence relations) the door is opened for meaningful analysis of complex power structures. Brief reference is made to findings from two experiments pertaining to hypotheses advanced in this theory. ()
?:appearsInJournal
?:citationCount
  • 3977 ()
is ?:cites of
?:cites
?:created
  • 2016-06-24 ()
?:creator
?:doi
  • 10.2307/2089716 ()
?:estimatedCitationCount
  • 7057 ()
is ?:hasCitedEntity of
?:hasDiscipline
?:hasURL
?:issueIdentifier
  • 1 ()
?:publicationDate
  • 1962-02-01 ()
?:rank
  • 20032 ()
?:referenceCount
  • 1 ()
?:startingPage
  • 31 ()
?:title
  • Power-Dependence Relations ()
?:type
?:volume
  • 27 ()

Metadata

Anon_0  
expand all