PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • Transaction cost analysis is rapidly becoming an important theoretical paradigm in marketing. However, the accumulation of transaction cost studies has been accompanied by a growing body of criticism, primarily directed toward its underlying behavioral norm of opportunism. That norm is a serious theoretical deficiency, not only because it may be descriptively inaccurate, but also because it limits the applicability of the theoretical framework. The authors show that norms play a very significant role in structuring economically efficient relationships between independent firms. In the absence of supportive norms, it is not possible for parties whose specific assets are at risk to acquire vertical control as per the transaction cost prescription. Instead, those parties lose control because of their dependence. An empirical test of the conceptual model in a sample of manufacturer-supplier relationships shows good support for the authors' hypotheses. ()
?:appearsInJournal
?:citationCount
  • 1757 ()
is ?:cites of
?:cites
?:created
  • 2016-06-24 ()
?:creator
?:doi
  • 10.2307/1252040 ()
?:estimatedCitationCount
  • 2884 ()
is ?:hasCitedEntity of
?:hasDiscipline
?:hasURL
?:issueIdentifier
  • 2 ()
?:publicationDate
  • 1992-04-01 ()
?:rank
  • 18259 ()
?:referenceCount
  • 16 ()
?:startingPage
  • 32 ()
?:title
  • Do Norms Matter in Marketing Relationships ()
?:type
?:volume
  • 56 ()

Metadata

Anon_0  
expand all