PropertyValue
?:abstract
  • Abstract We distinguish axiomatically-based expert systems, whose design and implementation are guided by one or more axiomatically-base theories of decision-making (e.g., decision theory, Bayesian probability theory, maximum entropy theory), from traditional expert systems. An analysis of the knowledge acquisition and computational needs of axiomatically-based expert systems is presented. An explicit quantitative comparison is made between the actual knowledge acquisition effort required to build an existing expert system, and the effort that would be required to build an analogous axiomatically-based advice system. The costs and benefits of the axiomatic approach are discussed. The results suggest that the additional initial costs of knowledge acquisition for the axiomatic approach are outweighed by the long-term benefits this approach provides. ()
?:appearsInConferenceSeries
?:citationCount
  • 3 ()
is ?:cites of
?:created
  • 2016-06-24 ()
?:creator
?:endingPage
  • 55 ()
?:estimatedCitationCount
  • 3 ()
?:hasDiscipline
?:hasURL
?:language
  • en ()
?:publicationDate
  • 1987-11-04 ()
?:publisher
  • American Medical Informatics Association ()
?:rank
  • 23452 ()
?:referenceCount
  • 0 ()
?:startingPage
  • 49 ()
?:title
  • Advice Generation in an Axiomatically-Based Expert System ()
?:type

Metadata

Anon_0  
expand all